,—learninghowtolearnfromandaboutchessboardpositions,physicsproblems,patients,whatwehear, (Holmqvistetal.,2005).
Accordingtothelineofreasoningfollowedinthisarticle,,,—notbecauseofthesamenessofthetwo,butbecauseofbothsimilaritiesanddifferences.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
First,IthankJoanneLobatowhoorganizedtheNationalScienceFoundation “InternationalWorkingConference:AddressingtheTransferDilemma” (REC-0450208) inSanDiego,January13-16, “thedoctrineofsameness”:KingBeach,Yrj? Engestr?m,JohnMason,RicardoNemirovsky,NephiThompson,,,Yrj? Engestr?m,andThabitAl-Muranihavereadanearlierversionofthisarticle,andtheycontributedtoitsbettermentwithcomments,suggestions,,,twoanonymousreferees,andtheeditors (JanetKolodner ＆ JoanneLobato).JohnMasonreadandcommentedonthislatestversionofthearticle,?.
TheSwedishResearchCouncilhasfinanciallysupportedthewritingofthisarticle,andIamverygratefulforthat.
REFERENCES
Beach,K.(1999).Consequentialtransitions:,28,101-139.
Bowden,J.,＆ Marton,F.(2004).:RoutledgeFalmer.
Bransford,J.D.,＆ Schwartz,D.L.(1999).Rethinkingtransfer:,24,61-100.
Carraher,D.W.,Nemirovsky,R.,＆ Schliemann,A.D.(1995,July).Situatedgeneralization.Proceedingsofthe19thAnnualMeetingoftheInternationalGroupforthePsychologyofMathematicsEducation,Vol.1 (p.234).Recife,Brazil.
Chi,M.,Feltovich,P.,＆ Glaser,R.(1981).,5,121-152.
Chik,P.P.M.,＆ Lo,M.L.(2004). ＆ (eds.),Classroomdiscourseandthespaceoflearning (pp.89-110).Mahwah,NJ:Law-renceErlbaumAssociates,,A.D.(1965).:,F.(1983).:Duckworth.
